Trouble in the Workplace, Part 2

Guest Blogger: Katherine Vessenes, JD, CFP® - President, Vestment Advisors

 

In my December 12 post, I outlined three of the five most common claims and issues that are currently being brought against broker dealers by unhappy registered reps. The first three included class actions for unpaid overtime; claims for illegal charges for sales assistants, trading errors, marketing costs and technology fees; and promissory notes. Let's take a look at the final two.

 

Continue Reading...

Trouble in the Workplace, Part I

Guest Blogger: Katherine Vessenes, JD, CFP® - President, Vestment Advisors

Investors are not the only group going after the industry’s deep pockets. With numerous class actions pending against broker dealers by unhappy reps, it has become clear that claims between reps and their firms can be even more costly than the claims made by unhappy investors.

With both broker dealers and their reps getting bad legal advice, the issues keep escalating. There are five common claims and issues that are currently making their way through the courts or arbitration. Let’s take a look at the first three:

Continue Reading...

Another Point of View

Thought we would start sharing particularly interesting emails from readers of our blog. Here is a recent email from a retired state regulator, who agreed to be our first Guest Blogger. Thanks Ray!


Counselor:

As a retired state examiner (somewhat of an oxymoron because being a state examiner allows one to have the power of a retired examiner) I have signed up for your blog. Nevertheless, the title of the blog is not encouraging. Was the securities industry over regulated all those years that the NASD pretended to monitor spreads (the Christy Study)? Have you, like, heard of Henry Lodge and the other analysts who labeled stocks "POS"; a scatological reference that was at variance with their enthusiastic recommendations?

I'll probably think of the guy who changed his securities recommendations based upon those most likely to get his child into an elite school. Never mind, there is no need to guild the lily.

Moreover, one could go back all the way to the first SEC commissioners who numbered among their luminaries such admitted "pump and dump" operators as the senior Kennedy. Maybe it wasn't precisely illegal then; but only a fool would say Joseph Kennedy and "investor's advocate" in the same sentence. And the last ten years (and week) have pretty conclusively established , at least in my puny mind, that one cannot criticize securities regulation until it is at last tried.

But, hey, maybe you have the eloquence of angels and are endowed with the persuaveness of Michael Milken; the people who put together the Prudential Partnerships, or any of a myriad of miscreants who populated, and probably still populate the securities industry.

With respect to your talent, if not your views,


Raymond Gambel Louisiana 77-2000